http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/reference/525943

Outgoing Links

Predicate Object
contentType Journal Article
endingPage 9
issn 0003-6935
1539-4522
issueIdentifier 13
pageRange 3413-9
publicationName Applied Optics
startingPage 3413
hasFundingAgency http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/organization/MD5_d227a2e762d57a4d15a246dcaacb8db6
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/organization/MD5_e530aa7c29bd300c4d2d12147734da74
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/organization/MD5_a7a0e0242d6c8a1db5810fc311af64a6
bibliographicCitation Bai Y, Jia Q, Zhang Y, Huang Q, Yang Q, Ye S, He Z, Zhou Y, Xie S. Improvement of depth resolution in depth-resolved wavenumber-scanning interferometry using wavenumber-domain least-squares algorithm: comparison and experiment. Appl Opt. 2016 May 01;55(13):3413–9. doi: 10.1364/ao.55.003413. PMID: 27140349.
creator http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_256128e388643704bc036385d77dd781
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_5113608eb0ec764f24c87cc200eaf350
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_9137fe389d3788dfc8786b5f58f9a09a
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_0d85d3a19c47a395bc43a36d0ecfb4fb
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_0efc0209d4729c64ae418965ae6acad4
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_a72294ffa3f4609401721e88baa1d945
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_ca77d87378ff6df4c19c53658b3eedea
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_a918932a2c638fe1eec5b39639fb69a1
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_555e43ed98ac572e0df838e90ce550ce
date 2016-04-22-04:00^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date>
identifier https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27140349
https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.55.003413
isPartOf http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/journal/22496
https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/1539-4522
https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/0003-6935
language English
source https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
https://www.crossref.org/
title Improvement of depth resolution in depth-resolved wavenumber-scanning interferometry using wavenumber-domain least-squares algorithm: comparison and experiment

Total number of triples: 31.