| Predicate |
Object |
| contentType |
Journal Article|Review |
| issn |
1466-609X
1364-8535 |
| issueIdentifier |
1 |
| pageRange |
205- |
| publicationName |
Critical care (London, England) |
| startingPage |
205 |
| bibliographicCitation |
George P, Morris AM. Pro/con debate: Should antimicrobial stewardship programs be adopted universally in the intensive care unit? Crit Care. 2010;14(1):205. PMID: 20236505; PMCID: PMC2875495. |
| creator |
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_d535c1dfa552cdb08a6c28167e3e65b2
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/author/MD5_0ff357a27729af1765b596494f017541 |
| date |
2010-02-25-04:00^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date> |
| identifier |
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc8219
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20236505
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2875495 |
| isPartOf |
https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/1364-8535
https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/1466-609X
http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/journal/21886 |
| language |
English |
| source |
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
https://www.crossref.org/
https://scigraph.springernature.com/ |
| title |
Pro/con debate: Should antimicrobial stewardship programs be adopted universally in the intensive care unit? |
| discusses |
http://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/M0448397 |